I realize the wiki has a number of "vs." (or "vs") pages.1) rename this page to “Lump Sum v DCA Investing” similar to the wiki page “Traditional v Roth”.
However that approach seems to different from what Wikipedia suggests in Deciding on an article title
The article is about Lump sum investing, which I believe is recognizable, natural and precise.A good Wikipedia article title has the five following characteristics:
- Recognizability – The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize.
- Naturalness – The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such a title usually conveys what the subject is actually called in English.
- Precision – The title unambiguously identifies the article's subject and distinguishes it from other subjects.
- Concision – The title is not longer than necessary to identify the article's subject and distinguish it from other subjects.
- Consistency – The title is consistent with the pattern of similar articles' titles. Many of these patterns are listed (and linked) as topic-specific naming conventions on article titles, in the box above.
The same applies to the Dollar cost averaging article.
Yes there is a relationship or choice between them that investors may face, however each stands alone as recognizable, natural and precise.
Statistics: Posted by Peculiar_Investor — Fri Jan 17, 2025 5:33 pm